On Thursday, the US top court issued a ruling allowing – at least provisionally – that abortions can be carried out in Idaho in cases of medical emergencies experienced by pregnant women. The judgement, sided 6-3 with three of the six traditionalist justices opposing, effectively reinstated a federal justice’s pronouncement that Idaho’s near-complete abortion ban, supported by the Republicans, must bow to the 1986 US legislation referred to as the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (Emtala) in circumstances where the two laws collided.
A preliminary version of the judgement mistakenly surfaced on the court’s site on Wednesday, marking the second occurrence in the past two years where an important abortion judgement was unintentionally disclosed prior to its official release.
The Biden administration had initiated legal proceedings against Idaho, contending that Emtala prevailed over statewide legislature. Emtala compels hospitals receiving finances from the federal Medicare scheme to stabilize patients experiencing emergency medical conditions. Idaho is one among six states that impose abortion prohibitions with no caveats to safeguard pregnant women’s health.
President Biden remarked in a declaration, “Today’s supreme court order ensures that women in Idaho can access the emergency medical care they need while this case returns to the lower courts”. He highlighted the unfortunate circumstances of women being denied care, forced to await near-death conditions or evict their home state JUST to avail medical assistance, terming it as what should never be an American reality.
Biden, contesting for re-election this year, has put reproductive rights at the forefront of his campaign, striving to politicize the issue against Republicans. Donald Trump, the Republican contender for the November 5th US election, faces Biden. The former president, known for naming three of the six justices who formed the majority in the 2022 ruling, has consistently been under scrutiny over abortion rights throughout this year’s campaign; asserting his backing for exceptions in cases of rape, incest, and to protect maternal life in states with abortion bans. He also expressed support for the accessibility of in-vitro fertilization.
The recent verdict – a single line, unsigned order – removed an obstruction which the Justices had set against a January court ruling. However, rather than resolving the deep-rooted legal controversy, the Supreme court opted to push aside the case as “improvidently granted”.
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, who leans towards liberal views, expressed her accord with the court’s decision to revoke its block, albeit disagreed with the case’s dismissal. She described the legal condition as a “precarious stand-off”.
“In choosing not to bring resolution or certainty to this unfortunate circumstance, we have wasted an opportunity,” commented Justice Jackson. “And whilst we avoid specifying what the law demands, pregnant patients in Idaho, Texas and other locations will bear the consequences.”
Following the overturning of Roe’s ruling, a series of state-enforced abortion prohibitions, supported by Republicans, came into effect. Idaho’s law outlawed nearly every instance of abortion unless it was to save the life of the mother, imposing a two to five-year imprisonment sentence and revocation of medical license on doctors who defied the law.
Both supporters and adversaries of the abortion debate expressed their dissatisfaction with Thursday’s verdict.
“By letting Idaho’s near-total ban on abortion to take effect temporarily, the court has only managed to clear a fraction of the chaos it instigated, while failing to secure enduring access to medically necessary abortions and the paramountcy of federal law”, denoted Miriam Becker-Cohen, an attorney from the Constitutional Accountability Centre, a progressively inclined legal organization.
Danielle White, the chief legal advisor at anti-abortion organisation, Heartbeat International, commented that the ruling “poses more queries than it does solutions.” – Reuters
(c) Copyright Thomson Reuters 2024.