A recommendation was made to catch a track by The Mary Wallopers as the verdict came through. It seemed appropriate, given their forceful and lacking subtlety approach to music. Indeed, the current administration has suffered significant setbacks and defeats, with the opposition predominantly winning though the referendum’s impact remains rather ambiguous and ineffective. No further permanent comments on the subject seem necessary unless a repeat is needed for those perceived to be rather dim-witted and living removed from civilization, reiterating points is vital.
As for my personal voting pattern, it goes one way, then another, possibly the reverse. Who can tell? Which way is the breeze blowing today? What’s the latest fashion statement?
The implications of this political decision are much more long-term than anticipated. Interestingly, the government mentioned their intention to honour the decision of the public. Does this mean they had an alternative during the election, or a contingency plan if things went awry? Their statement, it appears, is not one they regretted in hindsight.
The government’s financial system is at risk of overshooting the budget. Why does the staff appear so nonchalant?
Seán Moncrieff: Relationships have crumbled over such issues; obviously, we must treat them with the seriousness they deserve.
The heir to Guinness has plans for the Iveagh Markets, aiming to transform it into a prized possession.
From costly tickets to missed referee calls, here are five takeaways from the final Six Nations weekend.
Mountaineers, streetcar drivers, taxi drivers, and state combatants have already rejected the guidance of presidents and nobility in two European referendums. These referendums solidified our relationship with the European Union and directed us towards the continental military army: a clear reference to the 2001 Nice and 2008 Lisbon Referendums.
As soon as the final poll was shut and the late-night voter had gone home, the contemporary administration suggested that repetitive voting would be necessary until the preferred outcome was achieved. This was a disgraceful occurrence to witness in our democratic society, especially in Ireland.
Remarkably, those who were previously hesitant are now safely hidden. The result of this referendum served as a barrier to all the necessities of the money-driven powers.
Irish neutrality is one area the establishment would be eager to invest time and money in, with the intent to add icing to the cake. They do not possess the bravery or honesty to explicitly voice this due to the expected backlash. As such, they cunningly navigate through a narrow path: slowly inching toward NATO, then slightly advancing, then subtly undermining the wall, then creating theoretical threats.
Indeed, the country’s neutrality is not explicitly stated in the constitution, but it is mentioned in clause 29 (1-3), which is essentially similar.
Should our upper-class leaders plan to tamper with this clause that shields us from global savagery, they should be aware that they will not have public support.