The Prime Minister has stated his dissatisfaction with the handling of the assault case of Private Crotty by the Armed Forces (News, 25th June). The presiding judge in the case was a government appointment, suggesting a measure of responsibility also lies with the government. Moreover, the protocols surrounding the verdicts of soldiers in civilian court as well as the presence of officers in court also fall within the government’s purview, as they are the civilian authorities for the military.
It might be more useful for the Prime Minister to express his frustration towards his Cabinet colleagues. I have high hopes and anticipation that the head of staff will vehemently challenge the Prime Minister’s misguided remarks on behalf of the myriad of upright soldiers, seamen, and air force personnel who are as horrified as everyone else by the injustice inflicted upon Natasha O’Brien. – Yours sincerely,
DONNCHA LENIHAN,
North Strand,
Dublin 3.
Dear Sir, – The depletion of our Armed Forces and the low morale can be comprehended, given the Prime Minister’s condemnation of their handling of the Crotty case. The instigation of an unjustified process by the Defence Forces would’ve undermined the legal case.
Our active duty personnel are entitled to respect and the observance of due process. – Kind regards,
GARETH GREGAN,
Ennis,
Co Clare.
Dear Sir, – The Prime Minister is dissatisfied with the Armed Forces’ handling of the repercussions concerning the case of an Irish soldier who ferociously attacked a woman. He aired his grievances over the sudden action, casting doubt on whether it was merely a response to public interest in the case.
The Defence Forces’ tardiness in responding is beyond doubt, with minimal justifiable reason. However, they shouldn’t be held liable for the sequence of cases highlighted by Fintan O’Toole in his piece, “Cathal Crotty’s suspended sentence another example of how judicial system is failing women” (Opinion & Analysis, 25th June). The article illustrates multiple cases of men convicted of violent acts against women, yet bearing minimal punishment. The onus lies with the judiciary, the Justice Department and ultimately, the Prime Minister’s government, as well as former governments. – Yours sincerely,
BARRY McCONVILLE,
Foxrock,
Dublin 18.