The reduction of income tax is a highly sought-after objective for Britain’s Conservative Party, seen as a key strategy to revitalise their dwindling electoral chances in the forthcoming general election.
Discussions around the issue permeate all assemblies amongst the right-wing tenets of the party, and former Prime Minister Liz Truss occasionally hosts mini-events centrally in London, primarily focusing on championing the plan to lessen taxes. Last month, she orchestrated an assembly in a disused church on Marsham Street, attracting apprehensive Tories seeking a financial wonder to save them from the risk of losing sway over marginal seats.
During the presentation of his last spring budget before the nation heads to the polls at the House of Commons on Wednesday, speculations were ripe that Chancellor of the Exchequer Jeremy Hunt might reveal an unforeseen policy.
This seemed unlikely since Hunt’s principal budget resolution to reduce the national insurance rate by 2p, costing £10 billion (€11.7 billion), had been signaled previously. Without making deeper slashes in the struggling public services to finance income tax reductions, it did not seem plausible for Hunt to have the sufficient funds to achieve it.
As anticipated, it turned out that Hunt’s conservative, subtle approach would not yield the early election gift that his fellow MPs were yearning for. The chancellor communicated that the UK was merely “on a journey” towards reduction of income tax. His sole concession was the cut in national insurance, beneficial to workers but not applicable to other income types, and not sufficient for those demanding more drastic cuts.
“Conservatives understand that lower taxes lead to accelerated growth,” stated Hunt. This comment sparked an uproar in the house, with opposition MPs criticizing the high tax load in the UK under the Tory leadership, prompting retaliatory shouts from conservative backbenchers.
Eleanor Laing, the Deputy Speaker, pleaded for silence so Hunt’s budget speech could be heard. Her comment, “The chancellor has hardly made any statement,” elicited wild laughter, as a multitude of MPs seemed to concur that Hunt had indeed delivered little of substance.
In a matter of a year, the UK’s financial predicament has been alarmingly acknowledged due to issues resulting from the pandemic and the financial shockwave triggered by the Ukraine conflict. The burden of tax is the heaviest it has been since World War II and the nation’s debt level, standing at 90% of GDP, signifies the peak level in the past six decades. An additional plight is a mild economic downturn since last year, though a meagre growth of 0.8 per cent is predicted for 2024 by the Office of Budget Responsibility (OBR).
To stimulate growth by meaningfully reducing taxes, Chancellor Hunt would have required more than just his typical government resources – it would have taken a magical intervention. The slight deduction in national insurance, saving an average UK worker £450 yearly, has left the chancellor with a trifling £9 billion left in his emergency fund, a figure confirmed by the OBR.
The 2010 transition between the prominent parties witnessed a cautionary note from the outgoing Labour Treasury chief secretary, Liam Byrne saying, “there is no money.” The note will evidently ring with an amplified tone when the transfer of power is expected to repeat this year.
Could the UK be the next Silicon Valley of the world?
The Resolution Foundation’s CEO, Torsten Bell, acknowledges the slight modifications introduced by Hunt on Wednesday as an astonishing departure from the strategies of former Tory colleagues from 2010 onwards. The small-scale impact of the national insurance reduction will primarily benefit younger workers and have no added advantage for affluent pensioners, a major demographic of Conservative voters.
Hunt’s initiation during the fiscal meltdown under Truss was marked by his decision to freeze tax bands to supplement the Treasury. This effect was felt when wage growth in Britain reached 8.5% last summer amidst Europe’s staunch inflation and skyrocketing mortgage rates. This resulted in even supermarket chain Co-Op raising wages by over 10% this week.
Over the previous year, as employees received raises and surpassed the immobile tax-band thresholds, their tax bill naturally increased without any adjustments to the income tax rates by Mr. Hunt. This also impacted prosperous, elderly individuals who derived income from diverse sources, such as property rent and substantial pensions, as the band squeeze prevailed. However, the reduction in national insurance only covered salaries, disregarding the passive income investments preferred by these wealthier UK residents.
Bell, who previously advised former Labour leader Ed Miliband, noted that “Hunt’s most significant decision [this past Wednesday] was to reduce taxes for the youthful workforce whilst enabling tax increases for eight million retirees.” He further commented on the possible fallout, remarking that it’s not exactly evident who will shoulder the cost.
Bell continued, “The tax [national insurance] deductions publicised… with hopes to boost the government’s pre-election appeal, are based on the projection of an unfavourable £19 billion tax increase post-election, and the illusory assumption that an extra £19 billion in public services cuts can be achieved in a spending review which the Treasury has stated will not be convened until after the voting day.”
Numerous opinion polls conducted over the previous year reveal that, following living expenses, the biggest concern for British citizens as they approach elections is the poor condition of public services such as the National Health Service – some regions are experiencing waits of up to a year simply to register with an NHS dentist.
With £19 billion of Mr. Hunt’s fiscal plans already essentially unsupported, imposing further taxes without triggering societal upheaval was near impossible. This would be exacerbated by further slashing services to accommodate for the unfunded. Despite an average £450 decrease from the change in national insurance, Bell emphasised that the “general tax scenario remains untouched”.
As Bell quipped, “We are still a nation with a trend towards increasing, not decreasing taxes – equating to £3,900 extra per household – and a nation where income levels are predicted to remain below the last general election when the electorate vote again.”
Business communities accepted the difficult balancing act that Hunt faced, as they voiced minimal demand for tax breaks and other pro-business measures that usually would have been up for discussion.
The Confederation of British Industry, still recovering from allegations of misconduct among top personnel in 2022, recognised the chancellor’s “uncertain high-wire balancing act”.
Shevaun Haviland, who heads the British Chambers of Commerce, underscored that the proposed budget wouldn’t bring significant change for firms. While business assurance is on the rise, she acknowledged the foreseeable difficulties for many companies and emphasised the need for economic concerns to be at the heart of the impending general election narratives.
The proposed reduction in national insurance is anticipated to persuade approximately 200,000 out of work Britons to re-enter the labour force. This comes as the nation grapples with a severe labour deficit in the aftermath of Brexit. In past years, this shortfall had been offset by overseas labour – UK experienced a record influx of 745,000 legal migrants in 2022. This surge has triggered political instability over the topic and has challenged a significant aspect of the Brexit move, which aimed at reclaiming control over national boundaries.
In an effort to reconcile this, the Conservative government set a goal to boost the UK economy up the value chain, with a focus on a more skilled but smaller workforce. Hunt expressed his vision for an economy characterised by “high wages, high skills, and not dependent on migration”.
Coincidentally, pharmaceutical giant AstraZeneca declared its plans to invest £650 million in a manufacturing site in Cambridge and a novel vaccines centre near Liverpool, aligning well with the Chancellor’s narrative. Hunt welcomed this, stating his long-held view for the UK to be a manufacturing hub for medicines, not just developing them.
Drawing parallels to Ireland’s investment and growth plans, Hunt voiced the UK’s potential to become a technology capital. He mentioned the UK having twice the number of AI start-ups as any other European country, buoyed by PM Rishi Sunak’s major AI conference held in the previous year at Bletchley Park.
With venture capital investments and a tech economy twice the size of Germany’s and thrice that of France, Hunt maintained the UK’s trajectory towards becoming the next significant technology hub akin to Silicon Valley.
In spite of keenly attempting to talk up the UK’s future economic growth, the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) statistics revealed that the rapid economic growth experienced by the Republic, leading to increased wealth, appears likely to be out of the UK’s grasp for several upcoming years.
UK is predicted to slowly emerge from its economic slump this year, with projections showing a 0.8% growth, 1.9% growth in 2025 and a yearly average of 1.8% growth over the next three years based on the OBR’s figures.
The Institute for Government, a policy scrutinising think tank, noted, “Relative to the Bank of England, the predictions are considerably more sanguine about the inherent vigour of the economy.”
Moreover, so far as revitalising the UK’s economy and business environment is concerned, the endeavour to restore the UK’s former greatness continues to have a considerable distance to traverse.
Subscribe to Business Push Alerts to receive top news, insightful analysis, and commentary straight to your mobile device.
Keep informed by finding The Irish Times on WhatsApp and never miss out on updates.
Listen to our weekly Inside Business podcast to stay updated. You can find the latest episode here.