Dear Editor,
In his recent letter, Fintan Lane expressed his disappointment over the government’s approach towards neutrality, interpreting it as per their wishes (Letters, 15th June). This has unfortunately been a continued practice. Supporters of our existing form of neutrality, who are spread over a variety of ideological affiliations, also characterise neutrality based on their own perspectives, even though they seldom openly admit it. Similarly, those opposing neutrality have their personal interpretations of the concept and why it should be dismissed.
The definition of neutrality in Ireland has conspicuously lacked specificity, allowing the ruling government the discretion to decide their stance, if any, on international wars or conflicts, including the ongoing Ukrainian war. This is starkly different from the well-defined, active neutrality seen in other European nations, underpinned by fitting military resources to lend it credibility. The expectation is that European countries are likely to push Ireland to enhance its military prowess in the subsequent years.
There is an expectation for Ireland to take more responsibility in securing its territory and importantly, the international infrastructure within our territorial waters. A comprehensive discussion on neutrality might indeed be needed, followed by the development of a policy.
Yours Faithfully,
Brian Kelleher,
Ballinteer, Dublin 16.