On Thursday, Nato’s foreign ministers are gathering to commemorate the 75th anniversary of their alliance. They have concurred to initiate strategizing for a more substantial role in militarily assisting Ukraine. During their second-day assembly in Brussels, the ministers will observe the North Atlantic Treaty’s signing in Washington on 4th April, 1949. This treaty instigated the transatlantic political and military collaboration.
Jens Stoltenberg, Nato’s secretary-general, emphasised on Wednesday the paramount importance of the connection between Europe and North America as the world becomes increasingly perilous. Originally, Nato was formed by 12 members from both North America and Europe, as a reaction to the escalating apprehension that the Soviet Union might threaten European democracies.
Central to Nato is the principle of collective defence, the notion that an assault on one member constitutes a strike against all. This ensures western Europe is under the protective umbrella of the US military. Seventy-five years on, Nato now boasts 32 members and has resumed a key role in international affairs. This follows shifting attitudes among European governments that now perceive Moscow as a significant security risk, due to Russia’s war in Ukraine.
Finland and Sweden, the most recent members of Nato, joined in response to Russia’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine. Elina Valtonen, Finland’s foreign minister, stated that unlike Russia’s expansion attempts through annexation or illegal aggression, democratic nations freely choose to associate with Nato.
On Wednesday, Russia claimed that Nato was reverting to a Cold War stance. Foreign ministry spokesperson Maria Zakharova argued that Nato has no position in the “multipolar world” Moscow aims to establish to terminate US supremacy.
Nato ministers have decided to offer greater contributions towards security assistance and the training process for Ukraine, with Mr Stoltenberg proposing that Nato replace a US-led ad hoc coalition known as the Ramstein group, to safeguard against a potential reduction in US backing if Donald Trump gets re-elected. Furthermore, Mr Stoltenberg has pitched a €100 billion fund designed to bolster Ukraine’s military expenditure over a five-year period, according to diplomats. It remains uncertain whether Nato will accept this figure, as the organisation operates a consensus-driven decision-making policy.
Latvian foreign minister Krisjanis Karins – a speaker at the upcoming leaders’ summit in Washington in July – indicated that the proposal received a generally positive response, although some logistical specifics will need to be ironed out. During this meeting, the representatives are also anticipating a meeting with Dmytro Kuleba, the Foreign Minister for Ukraine. In a statement to Reuters, Kuleba expressed his intention to lobby for an increase in the provision of Patriot air defence systems to safeguard against the regular ballistic missile bombardments from Russia. He acknowledged the air defence systems currently provided by partners, but stressed the inadequacy of these measures considering the war’s magnitude. NATO nations, Kuleba believes, could supply additional Patriots if there was the political determination to do so.
Meanwhile, Russian deputy foreign minister, Alexander Grushko, voiced concerns about the increasingly strained Russia-NATO relationship but denied any intention on Moscow’s part to instigate a conflict with NATO. These remarks were shared with the Russian state news agency RIA, where Grushko noted a deliberate and predictable deterioration in relations. He highlighted that all communication channels with the alliance have been severed by Washington and Brussels, reducing dialogue to a critically low point. Querying whether NATO is equipped for open conflict with Russia would be best directed at the NATO members themselves, according to Grushko, as Russia has no plans to confront the alliance’s member countries.
Amid all this, NATO continues to aid Ukraine’s fight for survival against Russia’s assaults, supplying Kyiv with high-end weaponry, training, and intelligence. This involvement, according to Russia, essentially makes NATO an active participant in the dispute. Russian president Vladimir Putin warned in February that a direct confrontation between Russia and NATO would edge the world closer to a third global conflict. Putin’s 2022 heavy-handed ‘special military operation’ in Ukraine, designed to halt NATO’s progress towards Russia, appears to have only strengthened the alliance.
(c) Copyright Thomson Reuters 2024