The proposal by Education Minister, Norma Foley, to outlaw mobile phones in secondary schools might be perceived as a political move. The minister surely acknowledges that several schools have introduced prohibitions or greatly limited the use of mobile phones during educational hours, often with the backing of parents.
However, not every school has these restrictions and stories suggest that better-funded schools have managed to enforce prohibitions more effectively. It is hardly unexpected as such bans usually require students to put their phones in a secure location like a locker while at school. Enforcing the ban adds an extra burden for school staff and headteachers.
To pull off an obligatory ban, it is essential to address these issues and gain the agreement of parents and students. The viewpoint of The National Association of Principals and Deputy Principals is that a blanket ban might not be necessarily effective – schools should be given the liberty to devise their own approaches. This is a practical and reasonable approach if the aim is mutually agreed and understood.
The scale of the number of schools and pupils impacted by the minister’s proposed ban is unclear. However, if it results in greater control over students’ mobile phone use during school, it would be beneficial.
Foley makes a compelling case for limiting phone usage by citing a UN study that proves that mobile phones disrupt learning. The minister also pointed out the part phones play in online bullying and their negative effect on social interaction.
The ban could invoke broader positive effects. It would make a strong statement that excessive usage of mobile phones and the social media platforms they serve can harm young people’s health and growth, and could even lay the groundwork for future preventive actions by the State. Consequently, this move could have down-the-line effects beyond education and is a promising development.