Dear Sir,
The recent study conducted by the Charities Regulator on the Peter McVerry Trust (PMVT) exhibited a balanced and unbiased approach. Whilst no one questions the laudable work that the charity undertakes for the homeless, the examiner detected numerous major lapses in conforming to compliance rules and governance norms (News, October 15th).
It’s no longer acceptable for the voluntary sector to use the position of having good intentions as a shield. This ‘aura’ defence doesn’t float, especially when there’s an array of gurus working diligently at every level within the sector. The necessity for effective supervision and control cannot be downplayed; ignoring it isn’t an option anymore. There’s a growing trend of failures happening within the sector, and while these aren’t widespread, suggesting they’re rare incidents given the frequency over the past five years would be inaccurate.
There’s an urgent need for the charity sector to advocate for laws that enforce the practises it preaches and doles out repercussions when they’re disregarded. Corporations and governmental outfits work to different norms and have distinct sets of priorities. The third, alias the voluntary sector, uses a distinct set of assessment tools to examine its actual accomplishments and ascertain value for the investment of donors. Bearing in mind that the public is the primary source of funding, they’re entitled to know about the complete dynamics of charity management. The survival and sustainability of the sector is hinged on this important factor.
Prior legislative modifications did ensure a few notable administrative enhancements mainly to rectify Civil Service jurisdiction. However, there’s an increasing need for an in-depth examination on the charity sector to ensure it adjusts to meet legal requirements, and deliver on matters relating to performance, governance, and supervision.
Yours faithfully,
Greg Maxwell,
Celbridge,
Co Kildare.