The commencement of an industrial ‘work to rule’ by Aer Lingus pilots, as directed by the Irish Air Line Pilots’ Association (Ialpa), is forecasted to cause disruptions for numerous travellers. This action, stemming from disagreements regarding wage increases, has led to the grounding of approximately 270 flights since its inception post-midnight. As part of this action, pilots will refrain from working beyond their assigned hours or accommodating changes to their rosters, affecting Aer Lingus’ ability to maintain its hectic summer timetable.
In response, the airline assured passengers it would focus on mitigating the impact of the disruptions. In addition, Aer Lingus announced the cancellation of fifty additional flights scheduled for the 1st and 2nd of July to further reduce potential passenger inconvenience.
The Labour Court, after being informed of the disagreement, has decided not to intervene at this stage but will reconsider its position next week, as the Ialpa continues to demand a pay rise of about 24%. These demands, justified by the union as in accordance with what pilots of other airlines have received and reasonable in light of the cost of living crisis, is set to culminate in a strike on Saturday, 29th June from 5am to 1pm.
Vice-president of finance at Ialpa, Capt Daniel Langan, urged Aer Lingus to resume dialogues and negotiation efforts to prevent the upcoming strike; the airline has confirmed its willingness for further negotiation both directly and through the state’s industrial relations infrastructure. Aer Lingus also cautioned the Ialpa about the potential harm caused by the labour action to passengers, the company itself, and the overall Irish economy.
After presenting the union’s stance to the Labour Court on Tuesday, Ialpa president Capt Mark Tighe stated the action would persist until the union’s grievances were addressed. While Aer Lingus CEO Lynne Embleton and chief corporate affairs officer, Donal Moriarty, described initial talks with Labour Court officials as “constructive”, the airline expressed disappointment at the court’s decision not to intervene at this stage.